General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · California

Rialto (Onsite Target)

Rialto, CA · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rialto (Onsite Target) runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Rialto (Onsite Target): 1.0 TCR = 22% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rialto (Onsite Target) safety composite

Rialto (Onsite Target) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2021→2024

Rialto (Onsite Target) injury rate improved

Rialto (Onsite Target)'s TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Rialto, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/218
  • PHOTO Heritage Freight Cor…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Freight Corporate Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rialto (Onsite Target) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rialto (Onsite Target) averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rialto (Onsite Target) TCR series: 2021=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Rialto (Onsite Target) falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 218 General freight trucking, long employers in California.

Rialto (Onsite Target) (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rialto (Onsite Target)
Rialto (Onsite Target) (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Rialto (Onsite Target) has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · CA · Rialto

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Rialto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Freight Corporate Office 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knoxville Terminal 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knight Refrigerated Columbus 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fontana, CA - 10641 Calabash 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB7 4,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB7 4,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB8 2,705 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3806 - Rialto CA DC 1,822 FTE
NAT-TCR Saturn of St. Paul 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ermine Arbys 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Penny Lane Printing, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Prairie TX Millwork 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE PaulB LLC Mechanicsburg 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Herzog Contracting Corp. - Silverline 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Productions Unlimited Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therm-O-Link 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.