Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Michigan

Ribrell 21

Grand Rapids, MI · ~58 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ribrell 21 runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Ribrell 21: 12.4 TCR = 191% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ribrell 21 safety composite

Ribrell 21 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.8

2022→2024

Ribrell 21 injury rate improved

Ribrell 21's TCR fell 32.8 from 35.0 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 35.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=35.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.4 · 191% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #160/202
  • PHOTO FedEx 1500 NICHOLS
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 1500 NICHOLS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Ribrell 21 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ribrell 21 averages 12.4 TCR (191% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ribrell 21 TCR series: 2022=35 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Ribrell 21 falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 202 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Michigan.

Ribrell 21 (58 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Ribrell 21
Ribrell 21 (58 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Ribrell 21 has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 35.0 30.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MI · Grand Rapids

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 1500 NICHOLS 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marsil Xpress 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 596010000 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 975040000 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (WI) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTBS Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Rouge Power Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherryland Electric Cooperative 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Craftweld Fabrication Co. Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TX ST Lair 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Almond Heights 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Structural Building Systems, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Point Oh Distribution Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Fire Protection, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azngs - Nogales 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iamar - Marshalltown 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.