Commercial building construction general contractors · Ohio

Structural Building Systems, Inc.

Hudson, OH · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structural Building Systems, Inc. runs at 427% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Structural Building Systems, Inc.: 12.4 TCR = 427% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structural Building Systems, Inc. safety composite

Structural Building Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Structural Building Systems, Inc.: 7.0 → 22.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 51.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2024

Structural Building Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 15.0 from 7.0 in 2016 to 22.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 51.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Hudson, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 427% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #218/220
  • PHOTO River Terminal Devel…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: River Terminal Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Structural Building Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structural Building Systems, Inc. averages 12.4 TCR (427% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structural Building Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=51.7 · 2018=11.9 · 2020=26.9 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=22 · BLS 2.9

Where Structural Building Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 220 Commercial building constructi employers in Ohio.

Structural Building Systems, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Structural Building Systems, Inc.
Structural Building Systems, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Structural Building Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.0 17.6 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.9 6.0 4 0 0
2021 10.9 3.6 3 0 0
2020 26.9 15.4 7 0 0
2018 11.9 6.0 4 0 0
2017 51.7 51.7 1 0 0
2016 7.0 7.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Hudson

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 40 employers in Hudson, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR River Terminal Development 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott County Animal Shelter 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VISION SCENERY 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Tikes Hudson 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR LeafFilter CORP 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR MGA Entertainment 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hudson Distribution Center 375 FTE
NAT-TCR Structural Wood Corporation 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Omaha 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR M&M - Kansas City Operations 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ribrell 21 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zoetis - White Hall, IL 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boozer Laminated Beam Company Inc 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel Plate Fabricators 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gerdau Metals Recycling - Roanoke 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.