Commercial building construction general contractors · Oregon

Rich Duncan Construction

Salem, OR · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rich Duncan Construction runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Rich Duncan Construction: 4.4 TCR = 151% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rich Duncan Construction safety composite

Rich Duncan Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2019→2024

Rich Duncan Construction injury rate improved

Rich Duncan Construction's TCR fell 7.6 from 11.3 in 2019 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 151% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #53/95
  • PHOTO Emerick Construction
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emerick Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Rich Duncan Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rich Duncan Construction averages 4.4 TCR (151% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rich Duncan Construction TCR series: 2019=11.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 2.9

Where Rich Duncan Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 95 Commercial building constructi employers in Oregon.

Rich Duncan Construction (35 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Rich Duncan Construction
Rich Duncan Construction (35 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Rich Duncan Construction has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 11.3 5.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OR · Salem

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emerick Construction 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Wilson Constructors 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jarrett Construction Services 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameritech Ball Ground, Georgia 102, 105,900 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schanno-McClaskey Orchards, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom Nursery Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Rio Farms 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redmond Maint HQ 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR Mosaic Urbandale 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mosaic Macomb 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rice Lake Express, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ABCO Sprinkler 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Highpoint Tool and Machine 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micron Manufacturing Company 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Box Systems Electrical Contractors LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE WESTFIELD 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.