Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Pennsylvania

Richard E. Pierson Construction

Kutztown, PA · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richard E. Pierson Construction runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Richard E. Pierson Construction: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richard E. Pierson Construction safety composite

Richard E. Pierson Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Richard E. Pierson Construction held a steady TCR band

Richard E. Pierson Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Kutztown, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/196
  • PHOTO Rogers Group, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rogers Group, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Richard E. Pierson Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richard E. Pierson Construction averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richard E. Pierson Construction TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Richard E. Pierson Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 196 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Pennsylvania.

Richard E. Pierson Construction (63 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Richard E. Pierson Construction
Richard E. Pierson Construction (63 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Richard E. Pierson Construction has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Kutztown

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 43 employers in Kutztown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rogers Group, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 9 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 70 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 88 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillandale Gettysburg LP DBA Hillandale Farms - Atlantic 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Rose Interior Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Oilfield Solutions 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 30 - Kutztown, PA 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 30 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jetson Specialty Marketing Services Inc 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIRE AND CABLE 253 FTE
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newport Beach 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Motor Company 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cookson Hills Electric Cooperative Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE KS Energy Services Appleton WI 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.