Continuing care retirement communities · Tennessee

Richland Place Apartment Homes

Nashville, TN · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richland Place Apartment Homes runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Richland Place Apartment Homes: 6.0 TCR = 157% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richland Place Apartment Homes safety composite

Richland Place Apartment Homes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.8

2020→2023

Richland Place Apartment Homes injury rate improved

Richland Place Apartment Homes's TCR fell 19.8 from 19.8 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=19.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Nashville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 157% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/100
  • PHOTO El Rio Memory Care
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Rio Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Richland Place Apartment Homes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richland Place Apartment Homes averages 6.0 TCR (157% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richland Place Apartment Homes TCR series: 2020=19.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Richland Place Apartment Homes falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 100 Continuing care retirement com employers in Tennessee.

Richland Place Apartment Homes (47 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Richland Place Apartment Homes
Richland Place Apartment Homes (47 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Richland Place Apartment Homes has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 0 2 0
2020 19.8 16.9 2 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Nashville

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Rio Memory Care 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SinaiResidences 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Active Retirement Inc., DBA Jefferson's Ferry 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Hills of Independence 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tennessee Hatchery 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Proton Power Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAE Analytical Lab 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC420 - Nashville 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR HL Welding, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NG Turf LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR United States Building Supply, Inc 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Distributing Company 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clovis Service Center-092 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort St Vrain Station-285 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contech Mgmpp 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foam Fabricators Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.