Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · California

Richmond

Richmond, CA · ~119 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richmond runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade D.

Richmond: 7.2 TCR = 159% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richmond safety composite

Richmond scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Richmond injury rate improved

Richmond's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=12.0 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=14.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 159% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #86/110
  • PHOTO Obion Live Haul
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Obion Live Haul (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richmond averages 7.2 TCR (159% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richmond TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=12 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=14.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Richmond falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 110 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in California.

Richmond (119 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Richmond
Richmond (119 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Richmond has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2023 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 14.6 13.8 19 0 0
2020 11.5 8.4 15 0 0
2019 12.0 12.0 17 0 0
2018 11.6 6.5 15 1 0
2017 7.9 6.8 7 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CA · Richmond

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Obion Live Haul 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Mountain Truck Lines Inc 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renal Home Patient - P and F (Buford GA USA - P and F) 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WHITE OAK TRANSPORTATION COMPLEX -EST 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Prep, LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Cousteau 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Flowers 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Porter's Tire Store 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rescue Squad 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cives Steel Company North-West Division 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Contemporary Cabinetry East 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tiseo Paving 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baltimore Call Center 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acro Industries 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAM LLC dba Mid America Specialty Services 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.