For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · Virginia

Richmond Division

Richmond, VA · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richmond Division runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Richmond Division: 0.9 TCR = 25% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richmond Division safety composite

Richmond Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Richmond Division held a steady TCR band

Richmond Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Richmond, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO Lennar Houston
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lennar Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Richmond Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richmond Division averages 0.9 TCR (25% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richmond Division TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Richmond Division falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in Virginia.

Richmond Division (30 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Richmond Division
Richmond Division (30 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Richmond Division has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · VA · Richmond

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lennar Houston 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GL Homes of Florida Corporation 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MYR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clayton Properties Group, Inc. dba Highland Homes 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAES : Altavista Power Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest River Water Treatment Plant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Wastewater Collections 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Class Contracting of Tidewater, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR BAS - Baystate Administrative Services 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Saft America Inc. , Valdese, NC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Energy Center, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cummings Electrical 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenville Division 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grocery Outlet of Newberg Oregon 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE NE Columbus 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Passage High School 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.