For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · South Carolina

Greenville Division

Greenville, SC · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville Division runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Greenville Division: 0.7 TCR = 18% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville Division safety composite

Greenville Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

Greenville Division injury rate improved

Greenville Division's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO D2DIV-PH-DALLAS 2 DI…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D2DIV-PH-DALLAS 2 DIVISION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenville Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville Division averages 0.7 TCR (18% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville Division TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Greenville Division falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in South Carolina.

Greenville Division (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville Division
Greenville Division (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Greenville Division has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · SC · Greenville

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D2DIV-PH-DALLAS 2 DIVISION 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar Austin 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar - Coastal Carolinas (Charleston) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Morrison, Inc. (Nevada Division) 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENMARK DISTRICT OFFICE 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood Operations Center 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center - PNG 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR D. H. Griffin Wrecking Company, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dogwood Energy Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EnergySolutions 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond Division 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grocery Outlet of Newberg Oregon 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE NE Columbus 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Passage High School 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.