Nursing homes · Kentucky
Richmond Health Facilities
Richmond, KY · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 17.6
- Avg TCR
- 6.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Richmond Health Facilities runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.
Richmond Health Facilities: 17.6 TCR = 270% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Richmond Health Facilities safety composite
Richmond Health Facilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
23/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 17.55 per 100 workers
Safer than 8% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 8.08 per 100 workers
Safer than 21% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−14.9
2016→2017
Richmond Health Facilities injury rate improved
Richmond Health Facilities's TCR fell 14.9 from 25.0 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 25.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=25.0 · 2017=10.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623110 · Richmond, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 270% of ind
- DART 8.1 DART
- RANK #317/340
- PHOTO Oak Crossing
- BOOK 2y book
- INJ 16 inj
- SIZE ~75 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Oak Crossing (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →
Richmond Health Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Richmond Health Facilities
17.6 TCR
- Oak Crossing
Oak Crossing
17.6 TCR
- IA,SHELDON - C
IA,SHELDON - Campus - Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities)
17.6 TCR
- St. Mary's Alz
St. Mary's Alzheimer's Center
17.6 TCR
- The Regency Sk
The Regency Skilled Nursing and Therapy
17.6 TCR
What this shows Richmond Health Facilities averages 17.6 TCR (270% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).
Richmond Health Facilities TCR series: 2016=25 · 2017=10.1 · BLS 6.5
Where Richmond Health Facilities falls in its industry
15,252 Nursing homes establishmentsSafer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.
Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #317 safest of 340 Nursing homes employers in Kentucky.
Richmond Health Facilities has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 10.1 | 8.1 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623110 · KY · Richmond
15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 100 employers in Richmond, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.