Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Sierra Ridge Memory Care

Auburn, CA · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sierra Ridge Memory Care runs at 669% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sierra Ridge Memory Care: 25.4 TCR = 669% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sierra Ridge Memory Care safety composite

Sierra Ridge Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sierra Ridge Memory Care: 6.5 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 71.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2023

Sierra Ridge Memory Care's TCR rose 8.1 from 6.5 in 2016 to 14.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 71.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Auburn, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.4 · 669% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #211/216
  • PHOTO MD1540-BVSL-BV WEST …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MD1540-BVSL-BV WEST END (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sierra Ridge Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sierra Ridge Memory Care averages 25.4 TCR (669% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sierra Ridge Memory Care TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2019=26.3 · 2020=31.8 · 2021=48 · 2022=71.6 · 2023=14.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Sierra Ridge Memory Care falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sierra Ridge Memory Care (34 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sierra Ridge Memory Care
Sierra Ridge Memory Care (34 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Sierra Ridge Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.6 11.0 1 3 0
2022 71.6 55.7 7 11 0
2021 48.0 44.0 4 8 0
2020 31.8 26.1 9 2 0
2019 26.3 23.4 9 0 0
2016 6.5 6.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Auburn

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MD1540-BVSL-BV WEST END 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Blaine 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Resident Ferry Park 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RidgeView Assisted Living 25.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitney High School East 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Azria Health Winterset 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spruce Street Inn 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Etbj Enterprises LLC 25.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #5323 North Bergen, NJ 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster-Morrisania Houses 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sack-Wern 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Tuscaloosa 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.