Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Texas

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC

Fort Worth, TX · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC: 1.5 TCR = 40% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC safety composite

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1214.3

2021→2024

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC injury rate improved

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC's TCR fell 1214.3 from 1216.5 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1216.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1216.5 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #14/220
  • PHOTO Strake Place
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Strake Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC averages 1.5 TCR (40% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC TCR series: 2021=1216.5 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 220 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC (57 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC
Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC (57 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Ridglea Senior Living 2015, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1216.5 1216.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Fort Worth

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Strake Place 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Hamilton 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00312-Bristol Village 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Monroe Square Assisted Living 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 743 Kitchen 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CBG Biotech Ltd 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott Street Tomato House, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mark Anthony Brewing 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE a.j. Veneklasen, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atrium Health Union 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Georgia Hlth Sys - Brunswick 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aaa Admin 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.