Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · Florida

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc

Gainesville, FL · ~135 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc: 6.2 TCR = 187% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc safety composite

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc injury rate improved

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Gainesville, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/30
  • PHOTO SCP
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc averages 6.2 TCR (187% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 30 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in Florida.

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc (135 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc
Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc (135 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Ridgway Roof Truss Co Inc has more employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.5 1.7 6 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2021 5.5 1.9 9 0 0
2020 8.7 6.8 14 0 0
2019 13.6 11.1 27 0 0
2018 8.3 4.5 11 0 0
2017 6.2 3.7 10 0 0
2016 6.0 3.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · FL · Gainesville

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 278 employers in Gainesville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCP 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madera Component Systems, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Metre Building and Strategic Engineering, L.L.C. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ufp Folkston LLC 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Forest Complex 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Page Mechanical Group Inc. 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103572 - Selmon Expressway Western Extension 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts and Roberts, Inc. 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shands UF Hospital 9,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terrace Health & Rehabilitation Center 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida North Florida Hospital 2,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTH FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,770 FTE
NAT-TCR Segale Bros. Wood Products Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlton Electric 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brentwood Industries 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Premold Corp 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arlington Care Center 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet Midwest 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE CK Newberry Highway and Heavy Construction LLC 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Union Drydock Co 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.