Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufacturing · Texas

Rigid Global Buildings

Houston, TX · ~357 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rigid Global Buildings runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Rigid Global Buildings: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rigid Global Buildings safety composite

Rigid Global Buildings scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1052.8

2016→2023

Rigid Global Buildings injury rate improved

Rigid Global Buildings's TCR fell 1052.8 from 1055.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1055.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1055.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #26/43
  • PHOTO ModuleXSolutions
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ModuleXSolutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Rigid Global Buildings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rigid Global Buildings averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rigid Global Buildings TCR series: 2016=1055 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Rigid Global Buildings falls in its industry

393 Prefabricated buildings, metal establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 43 Prefabricated buildings, metal employers in Texas.

Rigid Global Buildings (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rigid Global Buildings
Rigid Global Buildings (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Rigid Global Buildings has more employees than the Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 1.9 9 0 0
2021 3.1 2.6 12 0 0
2020 2.7 1.9 10 0 0
2019 4.8 3.3 16 3 0
2018 4.0 2.1 18 1 0
2017 3.1 1.9 11 2 0
2016 1055.0 967.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · TX · Houston

393 Prefabricated buildings, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ModuleXSolutions 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mckool Duct 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Protect Controls, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metl-Span Lewisville 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mont Belvieu Complex 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duphil Corporate Office 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tidal Logistics, Inc. 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE A-Core of Texas 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Equipment Manufacturing 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites Pensacola FL 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornerstone Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jerry Short Cabinets & Millwork 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alkar Fairfield 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE OAT Seaborne 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cornerstone Packing & Cooling 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Materials, Inc. 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.