Water distribution (except irrigation) · California

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district

Escondido, CA · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Water distribution (except irrigation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district: 0.8 TCR = 68% of Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district safety composite

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district held a steady TCR band

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Escondido, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/176
  • PHOTO ILAWC Chicago Metro
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ILAWC Chicago Metro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rincon Del diablo municipal water district averages 0.8 TCR (68% of the Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Rincon Del diablo municipal water district falls in its industry

727 Water distribution (except irr establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 176 Water distribution (except irr employers in California.

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rincon Del diablo municipal water district
Rincon Del diablo municipal water district (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Rincon Del diablo municipal water district has fewer employees than the Water distribution (except irrigation) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Escondido

727 Water distribution (except irrigation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Escondido, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ILAWC Chicago Metro 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento Suburban Water District 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Water Users 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. - Main Office 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Escondido 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Escondido 3,031 FTE
CITY-NEAR Escondido CA 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Media Mosaic Inc. DBA The Mosaic Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Boldt Company - Cloquet, MN 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oil Spill Response USA Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif Sweetwater 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Russell Landscape Partners- Savannah 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarke Power Services-107 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branch 403 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elk Run 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.