Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Mississippi

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka

Iuka, MS · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka: 10.3 TCR = 191% of Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka safety composite

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2018→2019

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka injury rate improved

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka's TCR fell 1.5 from 11.1 in 2018 to 9.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.1 · 2019=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Iuka, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.3 · 191% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Secor Ltd., DBA AWE …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Secor Ltd., DBA AWE Tuning (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka averages 10.3 TCR (191% of the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka TCR series: 2018=11.1 · 2019=9.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka falls in its industry

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil employers in Mississippi.

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka (24 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka
Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka (24 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Ripley Industries, Inc./Iuka has fewer employees than the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) au median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 11.1 7.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · MS · Iuka

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 32 employers in Iuka, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Secor Ltd., DBA AWE Tuning 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JOST INTERNATIONAL 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.A. Wheel and Sons, Inc. 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topy America - Frankfort 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurel Office MPC3301 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Construction Group, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Company, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&T Construction, Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-MS01 440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roll Form 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tishomingo Health Services 177 FTE
NAT-TCR Odwalla-Anaheim 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonesta ES Suites Cleveland Airport 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside of Sumter 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SPO 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE B & T Shavings, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palm Beach Gardens Clearence Outlet # 930 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington, Sc - Americold 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Fallon, Mo - Hs 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.