Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · District of Columbia

ritz carlton hotel

Washington, DC · ~410 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ritz carlton hotel runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade B.

ritz carlton hotel: 2.3 TCR = 76% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ritz carlton hotel safety composite

ritz carlton hotel scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ritz carlton hotel held a steady TCR band

ritz carlton hotel's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #15/71
  • PHOTO Towne Place Buffalo
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~410 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Towne Place Buffalo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

ritz carlton hotel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ritz carlton hotel averages 2.3 TCR (76% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ritz carlton hotel TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2.3 · BLS 3.0

Where ritz carlton hotel falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 71 Hotel management services (i.e employers in District of Columbia.

ritz carlton hotel (410 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ritz carlton hotel
ritz carlton hotel (410 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

ritz carlton hotel has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.3 1.4 8 0 0
2016 2.3 1.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · DC · Washington

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Towne Place Buffalo 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TownPlace Suites 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord PPF SPG Dadeland OpCo LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn Paducah 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washington (GH) 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE JLL Corp Office Washington, DC 404 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller & Long DC. 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anchor Construction Corporation 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Rai Mx Pit 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Langhorne, PA 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cranbury - VW 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Morristown, TN 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE RAI Crew CMH 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Bernardino (Casbe) 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temecula (Caper) 410 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.