Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture, television) erecting and dismantling, independent · California

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco

San Francisco, CA · ~863 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture, television) erecting and dismantling, independent workplace, earning a grade A.

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture, television) erecting and dismantling, independent BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco safety composite

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco held a steady TCR band

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711510 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO ATLANTA BALLET WAREH…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~863 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATLANTA BALLET WAREHOUSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ritz- Carlton San Francisco averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture, television) erecting and dismantling, independent BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco TCR series: 2023=0.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.1

Where Ritz- Carlton San Francisco falls in its industry

80 Stage set (e.g., concert, moti establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Stage set (e.g., concert, moti employers in California.

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco (863 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 861 employees and a TCR of 0.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ritz- Carlton San Francisco
Ritz- Carlton San Francisco (863 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 861 employees and a TCR of 0.1

Ritz- Carlton San Francisco has more employees than the Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711510 · CA · San Francisco

80 Stage set (e.g., concert, motion picture, television) erecting and dismantling, independent employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATLANTA BALLET WAREHOUSE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAPITOL THEATER 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLASSIC CENTER 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HILTON PORTLAND DOWNTOWN 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE N&L FARM LABOR SERVICES INC 863 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-80 863 FTE
STATE-SIZE PACIFIC AMPHITHEATER 863 FTE
STATE-SIZE DISCOVERY PARK 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Clearinghouse Building 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisiana Sugar Refining, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR OKTUCBOK 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ArcBest Technologies 991 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Surry Pwr Sta 863 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avancez, LLC 863 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN8 863 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corbins - Phoenix, Az 863 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.