Remodeling and renovating general contractors, multifamily building · California

River City Restoration Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

River City Restoration Inc. runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Remodeling and renovating general contractors, multifamily building workplace, earning a grade C.

River City Restoration Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 116% of Remodeling and renovating general contractors, multifamily building BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

River City Restoration Inc. safety composite

River City Restoration Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2024

River City Restoration Inc. injury rate improved

River City Restoration Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 8.9 in 2019 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.9 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 116% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #23/78
  • PHOTO Zolman Restoration, …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zolman Restoration, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

River City Restoration Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows River City Restoration Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (116% of the Remodeling and renovating general contractors, multifamily building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

River City Restoration Inc. TCR series: 2019=8.9 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where River City Restoration Inc. falls in its industry

698 Remodeling and renovating gene establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 78 Remodeling and renovating gene employers in California.

River City Restoration Inc. (46 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate River City Restoration Inc.
River City Restoration Inc. (46 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

River City Restoration Inc. has more employees than the Remodeling and renovating general contra median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 4.9 3 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2019 8.9 8.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · Sacramento

698 Remodeling and renovating general contractors, multifamily building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zolman Restoration, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamer Nicker Enterprises, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHRG PIT 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LeafGuard Colorado 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Republic 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Plastic Products 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR World Arts, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Express Columbus 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peregrine Senior Living at Orchard Park 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bazar Group Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nickelston Industries, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weiland Inc 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.