Skilled nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

Kingston, PA · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center: 9.1 TCR = 140% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center: 0.0 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 20.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2022

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 8.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 8.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Kingston, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.1 · 140% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #503/754
  • PHOTO Good Shepherd Commun…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Good Shepherd Community Care & Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center averages 9.1 TCR (140% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=20 · 2022=8.6 · BLS 6.5

Where River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #503 safest of 754 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.6 4.3 4 0 0
2021 20.0 18.0 5 5 0
2020 12.8 11.5 2 8 0
2019 4.1 2.7 2 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Kingston

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 24 employers in Kingston, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Good Shepherd Community Care & Rehabilitation 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelby Crossinig Health Campus 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HALE HO ALOHA INC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family of Caring at Teaneck ,LLc 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilkinsburg B 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kriger Pipeline, Incorporatated 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Archbald 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intermountain Medical Group 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manor Care Health Services - Kingston 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCSC-Laundry Kingston PA 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Third Ave Health and Rehab 86 FTE
NAT-TCR Somerby of Mount Pleasant 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo Branch Office 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 497794-Sal-Downtown Sta 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 216052-Met-Johnson St Sta 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Post-Acute Care PLLC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alma Plants 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Elementary School 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Systems Inc. 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.