Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Wisconsin

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse

La Crosse, WI · ~151 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade C.

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse: 4.1 TCR = 109% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse safety composite

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse: 1.0 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse's TCR rose 6.3 from 1.0 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · La Crosse, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/60
  • PHOTO Quantico Mess Halls
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quantico Mess Halls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverfront Inc. La Crosse averages 4.1 TCR (109% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverfront Inc. La Crosse falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 60 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Wisconsin.

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse (151 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverfront Inc. La Crosse
Riverfront Inc. La Crosse (151 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Riverfront Inc. La Crosse has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 7.3 0.0 7 1 0
2016 1.0 0.3 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · WI · La Crosse

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 188 employers in La Crosse, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quantico Mess Halls 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skils'kin - Headquarters 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 548811 009999_DE OHD_28417 DUPONT BLVD_OHD 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ODC - Opportunity Development Center 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barron Grow Out 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Uihlein Electric 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Manitowoc 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Bay, WI Facility 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center 3,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare Inc 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Clinic, Ltd. 2,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen - La Crosse Clinic 1,739 FTE
NAT-TCR 0181 - Glen Burnie, Md 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New York (Nysga) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Truck Body LLC- MFL Lakeland 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainville Community Schools Wheeler Elementary School 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Farmington LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-Swy 0035 3304 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE State College (Pasta) 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE U.S. Waterproofing 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.