Distribution of electric power · Wisconsin

Riverland Energy Cooperative

Arcadia, WI · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverland Energy Cooperative runs at 457% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverland Energy Cooperative: 5.5 TCR = 457% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverland Energy Cooperative safety composite

Riverland Energy Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2016→2024

Riverland Energy Cooperative injury rate improved

Riverland Energy Cooperative's TCR fell 9.7 from 12.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Arcadia, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 457% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #44/61
  • PHOTO Eversource - Daniels…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Danielson Elec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Riverland Energy Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverland Energy Cooperative averages 5.5 TCR (457% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverland Energy Cooperative TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=8 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Riverland Energy Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 61 Distribution of electric power employers in Wisconsin.

Riverland Energy Cooperative (45 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverland Energy Cooperative
Riverland Energy Cooperative (45 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Riverland Energy Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 2.5 0.0 0 1 0
2022 5.0 2.5 1 1 0
2021 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 1 1 0
2018 9.6 4.8 4 0 0
2017 8.0 2.0 3 1 0
2016 12.0 10.0 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · WI · Arcadia

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 26 employers in Arcadia, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Danielson Elec 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 3101 ARTESIAN 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Plains Substation 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lisbon 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Denmark Dairy LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plover #205 Farms 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock, WI Receiving Station 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arcadia Facility 3,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Furniture Industries - Arcadia 2,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Arcadia 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd. - Wisconsin 424 FTE
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - SGF 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Electro-Space Fabricators, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corn States Metal Fabricators, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bull Moose Heavy Haul, Inc. dba XL Specialized Trailers 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Hall 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Landscaping of MS, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howe Lumber 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ward Trucking LLC-Scranton 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.