Distribution of electric power · Connecticut

Eversource - Danielson Elec

Danielson, CT · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eversource - Danielson Elec runs at 457% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Eversource - Danielson Elec: 5.5 TCR = 457% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eversource - Danielson Elec safety composite

Eversource - Danielson Elec scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Eversource - Danielson Elec injury rate improved

Eversource - Danielson Elec's TCR fell 3.0 from 8.6 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Danielson, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 457% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO Riverland Energy Coo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverland Energy Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Eversource - Danielson Elec in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eversource - Danielson Elec averages 5.5 TCR (457% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eversource - Danielson Elec TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Eversource - Danielson Elec falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 Distribution of electric power employers in Connecticut.

Eversource - Danielson Elec (47 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eversource - Danielson Elec
Eversource - Danielson Elec (47 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eversource - Danielson Elec has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 1.9 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.4 4.7 6 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2019 6.2 4.1 2 1 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.8 2.9 4 0 0
2016 8.6 5.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CT · Danielson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 18 employers in Danielson, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverland Energy Cooperative 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 3101 ARTESIAN 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Plains Substation 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lisbon 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lindy Farms 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penna Construction (aka: A.J. Penna & Son Construction) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105603 - 155.7MW Gravel Pit CT Solar 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Company 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Supported Living Group 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR JACC Healthcare of Danielson dba Davis Place 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPIROL International Corporation 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc Quinebaug Valley 154 FTE
NAT-TCR East Penn Corydon 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Carilion Clinic-Urgent Care Co. 28 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Rehabilitation Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Plainview 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westridge Health Care Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willowbend Living Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Arthur Baking Co., Inc. - Merlin 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE 46-Olathe 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.