Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient · Virginia

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614

Chesapeake, VA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614: 4.7 TCR = 123% of Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 safety composite

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Chesapeake, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/16
  • PHOTO 1046 Fairfield Avenue
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1046 Fairfield Avenue (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 averages 4.7 TCR (123% of the Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 falls in its industry

599 Infusion therapy centers and c establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 16 Infusion therapy centers and c employers in Virginia.

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 (25 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614
Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 (25 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Riverside Cancer Infusion Center-Chesapeake-614 has fewer employees than the Infusion therapy centers and clinics, ou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · VA · Chesapeake

599 Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1046 Fairfield Avenue 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR InterMed Marginal Way 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Ford Plymouth - Ann Arbor Rd 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHC at Lauren's House-Chester County 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowman Orchards, LLc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle W Farms II, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Fruit Sales LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia Distributing Springfield 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maples Farm & Garden Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Legends - Indy Speedway 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hagerstown (Mdwil) 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3105 Republic Services of South Carolina, Hilton Head 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Sharonville 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCR - Dayton 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.