Homes for the aged with nursing care · New York

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Castleton, NY · ~101 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing: 10.3 TCR = 159% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing safety composite

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing: 7.4 → 13.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's TCR rose 5.8 from 7.4 in 2016 to 13.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Castleton, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #472/616
  • PHOTO Cumberland Pointe He…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cumberland Pointe Health Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing averages 10.3 TCR (159% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2024=13.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #472 safest of 616 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in New York.

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing (101 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing
Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing (101 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.2 11.8 4 5 0
2016 7.4 5.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Castleton

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 12 employers in Castleton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cumberland Pointe Health Campus 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Villa Terrace Assisted Living Center 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Gardens Convalescent Hospital 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsbrook Lifecare Center 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TINC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE 38A Fifty Acre 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE ONW NAM Blades Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE BROADWAY OPERATING HQTRS-NY02 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeBrino Caulking Associates Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Center for Rehabilitlation and Nursing 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM. J. Keller & Sons Construction Corp. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany 75 FTE
NAT-TCR Downey Post Acute 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 209 Thornton 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MOT 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arco Comfort Air 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE G&V Machine Company Inc 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Southern - IL Gas Ops 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio River Boats 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE SODEXO AT MOUNT SINAI HOSP and MED CTR ES 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.