Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) · Virginia

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127

Newport News, VA · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) workplace, earning a grade C.

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127: 4.2 TCR = 111% of Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 safety composite

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2017

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 injury rate improved

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127's TCR fell 8.4 from 8.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621512 · Newport News, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO East Montgomery Imag…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Montgomery Imaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 averages 4.2 TCR (111% of the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 falls in its industry

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (me establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Diagnostic imaging centers (me employers in Virginia.

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 (37 employees, TCR 4.2) among 24 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 25 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127
Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 (37 employees, TCR 4.2) among 24 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 has fewer employees than the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.4 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621512 · VA · Newport News

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 330 employers in Newport News, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Montgomery Imaging 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhode Island Medical Imaging- Barrington 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shared Medical Services 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Medical Systems 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek Orchards, Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert S. Coleman Lumber Co., Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulaski Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central District 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newport News Shipbuilding - Division of Huntington Ingalls Industries 24,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center 2,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center-113 1,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12490 Jefferson Ave 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Joplin (Mojop) 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GDIT Pawcatuck Mechanic St 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Generations at Agritopia 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR dd s DISCOUNTS Store 5237 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clarion Suites 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0337 - Hempstead, Ny 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0225 - Mc Allen, Tx 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0093 - Springfield, Mo 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.