Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Texas

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek

Forth Worth, TX · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek runs at 410% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek: 15.6 TCR = 410% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek safety composite

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−104.9

2020→2021

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek injury rate improved

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek's TCR fell 104.9 from 120.5 in 2020 to 15.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 120.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=120.5 · 2021=15.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Forth Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 410% of ind

  • DART 12.5 DART
  • RANK #211/220
  • PHOTO Artis Senior Living …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artis Senior Living of Evesham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek averages 15.6 TCR (410% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek TCR series: 2020=120.5 · 2021=15.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 220 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek (42 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek
Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek (42 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Riverside Inn at Fossil Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 15.6 12.5 5 0 0
2020 120.5 105.4 6 18 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Forth Worth

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Forth Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Evesham 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Clinton 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Creek St. Augustine 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Dadeland, LLC 15.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Southeast 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXAS BEEF PRODUCERS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3-H Dairy LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW4 678 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-OP Memeber Center 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR Team Select Home Care - FTW 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR BOXX Modular Holdings, Inc. / Black Diamond Group Limited 119 FTE
NAT-TCR CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Denver Kearney 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadfield Care Center 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730078-CS 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carmichael Machine Company 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenny Brothers Produce, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stein Steel & Supply Company 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Center 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.