Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Virginia

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester

Gloucester, VA · ~182 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester safety composite

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2020

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Gloucester, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #43/75
  • PHOTO Physicians East-Farm…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~182 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Physicians East-Farmville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester falls in its industry

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 75 Medical doctors' (MDs, except employers in Virginia.

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester (182 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester
Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester (182 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Riverside Medical Group-Gloucester has more employees than the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.4 0.7 5 0 0
2019 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2018 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2017 4.1 1.4 6 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · VA · Gloucester

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Gloucester, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Physicians East-Farmville 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR M Health FV Highland Park 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARDOC East Arkansas Regional Unit 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMG-Santa Fe St. Michael 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parker Seals 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Beverage LLC 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1538 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1594 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Walter Reed Hospital 5001 415 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1759 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1759 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Walter Reed Hospital 362 FTE
NAT-TCR Cora Texas Mfg. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Div. 156_162 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SPC Mechanical Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Remote 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarah A Todd Memorial Home 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE 348 Miami, Fl 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Health Allen Hospital 182 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.