Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture · Illinois

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal

Normal, IL · ~680 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade D.

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal: 5.4 TCR = 164% of Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal safety composite

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2018→2021

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal injury rate improved

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal's TCR fell 3.5 from 7.9 in 2018 to 4.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Normal, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Hwashin America
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 95 inj
  • SIZE ~680 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hwashin America (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal averages 5.4 TCR (164% of the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal TCR series: 2018=7.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal falls in its industry

158 Assembly plants, passenger car establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Assembly plants, passenger car employers in Illinois.

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal (680 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal
Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal (680 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal has more employees than the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chass median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.4 2.4 76 22 0
2020 7.4 1.9 13 10 0
2019 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.9 4.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · IL · Normal

158 Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 116 employers in Normal, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hwashin America 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flyer Defense 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMW of North America, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tell City Waupaca 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2073-SW-20730056-IF 680 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Normal 680 FTE
STATE-SIZE Byron Nuclear Power Station 681 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitness Formula Clubs 681 FTE
CITY-NEAR Normal Plant - 100 Rivian Motorway 7,793 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLean County CUSD #5 2,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate BroMenn Medical Center 1,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Community College 716 FTE
NAT-TCR Head Start-Ironton Admin 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Springs of Escondido, The 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Dental Group 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Flight Division - 1790 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Medivators - MN 680 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc 680 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dsf3 680 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premiere Raspberries, LLC 680 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.