Electric power generation, nuclear · Illinois

Byron Nuclear Power Station

Byron, IL · ~681 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Byron Nuclear Power Station runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Byron Nuclear Power Station: 0.2 TCR = 18% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Byron Nuclear Power Station safety composite

Byron Nuclear Power Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Byron Nuclear Power Station held a steady TCR band

Byron Nuclear Power Station's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.4 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Byron, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO St. Lucie Nuclear Pl…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~681 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Byron Nuclear Power Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Byron Nuclear Power Station averages 0.2 TCR (18% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Byron Nuclear Power Station TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Byron Nuclear Power Station falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Electric power generation, nuc employers in Illinois.

Byron Nuclear Power Station (681 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Byron Nuclear Power Station
Byron Nuclear Power Station (681 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Byron Nuclear Power Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.1 0 4 0
2023 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.3 0.3 0 2 0
2020 0.3 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.4 0.3 1 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.4 0.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · IL · Byron

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 6 employers in Byron, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Lucie Nuclear Plant 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kairos Power-Alameda 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Callaway Plant 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fitness Formula Clubs 681 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rivian Automotive, LLC - Normal 680 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2073-SW-20730056-IF 680 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Normal 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generations at Neighbors, LLC 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Byron Station 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Byron Forest Preserve 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market #217 63 FTE
NAT-TCR TCS 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR STL Holding Company, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbane Building Company Providence 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vallourec Star, LP 681 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fremont Research Center 681 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Court of CA, County of Alameda 681 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Health Tripoint 681 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.