Commercial building construction general contractors · Minnesota

RJM Construction LLC

Golden Valley, MN · ~149 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RJM Construction LLC runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

RJM Construction LLC: 2.5 TCR = 86% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RJM Construction LLC safety composite

RJM Construction LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

RJM Construction LLC injury rate improved

RJM Construction LLC's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Golden Valley, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/130
  • PHOTO TEAM DDS, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEAM DDS, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

RJM Construction LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RJM Construction LLC averages 2.5 TCR (86% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RJM Construction LLC TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.9

Where RJM Construction LLC falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 130 Commercial building constructi employers in Minnesota.

RJM Construction LLC (149 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate RJM Construction LLC
RJM Construction LLC (149 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

RJM Construction LLC has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.3 0.7 5 0 0
2022 3.0 1.5 4 0 0
2021 2.9 0.7 4 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2019 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2018 2.8 1.6 5 0 0
2017 3.1 0.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Golden Valley

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 115 employers in Golden Valley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEAM DDS, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBI General Contractors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1991_5878 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landry/French Construction 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Office 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Thermofoil Plant 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nonin Medical Headquarters 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills (Corporate) 3,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Companies 1,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR HoneywellMN10 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Ford Bell R&D Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-TCR J.L.Clark 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Coffee Farmers Cooperative 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Olean, NY 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Appliance Components 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blakeslee Prestress, Inc. 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willamette Valley Fruit Company 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Refrigeration Sales Company LLC 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Balfurd, Inc. 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.