Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Ohio

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc.

Piqua, OH · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 111% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. safety composite

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Piqua, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 111% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #151/220
  • PHOTO Poole Anderson Const…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Poole Anderson Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (111% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.9

Where RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 220 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Ohio.

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate RK Hydro-Vac, Inc.
RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. (61 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

RK Hydro-Vac, Inc. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 3.5 3 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.5 3.1 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Piqua

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 65 employers in Piqua, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Poole Anderson Construction 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edward A. Reider, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kozeny-Wagner, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hof Construction Inc Main Office 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DHI COOPERATIVE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Technologies International 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Operations Center 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE CIN 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evenflo Company 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps and Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps & Systems Piqua 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3765 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Apache Stainless Equipment Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutherford-Woodbury 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR To-Jo Mushrooms Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Roseburg Transportation 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 232 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 219 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIT Trucks - Corporate 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmont Admin 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.