Stationery made from purchased paper · Pennsylvania

Roaring Spring Paper Products

Martinsburg, PA · ~111 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roaring Spring Paper Products runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Stationery made from purchased paper workplace, earning a grade D.

Roaring Spring Paper Products: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Stationery made from purchased paper BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roaring Spring Paper Products safety composite

Roaring Spring Paper Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2016→2024

Roaring Spring Paper Products injury rate improved

Roaring Spring Paper Products's TCR fell 6.5 from 8.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=9.0 · 2018=13.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Martinsburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO East Coast Envelope …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Coast Envelope & Graphics, LLC (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Roaring Spring Paper Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roaring Spring Paper Products averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Stationery made from purchased paper BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roaring Spring Paper Products TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=9 · 2018=13.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=4 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Roaring Spring Paper Products falls in its industry

122 Stationery made from purchased establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 Stationery made from purchased employers in Pennsylvania.

Roaring Spring Paper Products (111 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roaring Spring Paper Products
Roaring Spring Paper Products (111 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Roaring Spring Paper Products has more employees than the Stationery made from purchased paper median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 3 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 13.4 11.6 15 0 0
2017 9.0 6.5 11 0 0
2016 8.0 4.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · PA · Martinsburg

122 Stationery made from purchased paper employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Martinsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Coast Envelope & Graphics, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-State Envelope Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smead Manufacturing Company 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment - Binghamton 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE The York Water Company 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & E Construction Co. 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE EciConstruction 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Turnpike Mont. County Road & Bridge Reconstruction 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Work & Outdoor Group Division 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Homewood at Martinsburg PA, Inc. 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Village at Morrisons Cove 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curry Supply - Curryville 121 FTE
NAT-TCR Nashville 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marianjoy Rehabilitation Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Washington Refrigeration LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Batavia 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper - Oklahoma City 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Attachments LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation District 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pictsweet Ogden 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.