Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · North Carolina

Roberts PolyPro Inc

Charlotte, NC · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roberts PolyPro Inc runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Roberts PolyPro Inc: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roberts PolyPro Inc safety composite

Roberts PolyPro Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

Roberts PolyPro Inc injury rate improved

Roberts PolyPro Inc's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/132
  • PHOTO Molded Fiber Glass T…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molded Fiber Glass Tray Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Roberts PolyPro Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roberts PolyPro Inc averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roberts PolyPro Inc TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Roberts PolyPro Inc falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 132 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in North Carolina.

Roberts PolyPro Inc (56 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Roberts PolyPro Inc
Roberts PolyPro Inc (56 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Roberts PolyPro Inc has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2022 5.6 3.7 3 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2019 4.0 2.0 1 1 0
2018 7.7 3.1 5 0 0
2017 6.1 2.0 3 0 0
2016 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Charlotte

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molded Fiber Glass Tray Company 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oneida Molded Plastics, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking Pools - TX 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latham Packaged Pools - Suwanee 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Tri-State 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siler City Hatchery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Rose & Sons, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roanoke Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Highland Village #303 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spooky Nook Sports Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Concast Birmingham Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Galbreath LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santana Row #404 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wadsworth 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caldwell Terminal 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.