Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch

Glendale, AZ · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch: 8.8 TCR = 231% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch safety composite

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch: 4.5 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch's TCR rose 3.2 from 4.5 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 22.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Glendale, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 231% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #86/173
  • PHOTO Arbor View
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbor View (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch averages 8.8 TCR (231% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=22.2 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch (56 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch
Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch (56 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2020 7.8 5.9 3 1 0
2019 22.2 11.1 10 2 0
2018 12.3 0.0 7 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 4 7 0
2016 4.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Glendale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 313 employers in Glendale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbor View 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woburn 3 Opec LLC DBA Country Club Heights 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tarzana 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sugarland Ridge, Elmcroft of 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Casa Grande Office 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Bath Phoenix 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Group Collective 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowley Plastering LC 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 730 ABRAZO ARROWHEAD CAMPUS 1,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glendale Elementary School District 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-730 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-515 910 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Beef Feed Yard 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stew Leonard's - Newington 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Human Technologies, Inc. Ardmore 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Webster 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santana Row #404 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roberts PolyPro Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE True North Trucking 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Admin Building 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.