Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Maryland

Robinwood Assisted Living

Hagerstown, MD · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Robinwood Assisted Living runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Robinwood Assisted Living: 11.3 TCR = 297% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Robinwood Assisted Living safety composite

Robinwood Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Robinwood Assisted Living: 0.0 → 57.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 57.4 TCR · DART/TCR 3.56× in 2021

Robinwood Assisted Living's TCR rose 57.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 57.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 3.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hagerstown, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 297% of ind

  • DART 40.2 DART
  • RANK #69/87
  • PHOTO Blue Ridge Senior Ho…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Robinwood Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Robinwood Assisted Living averages 11.3 TCR (297% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Robinwood Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=14.2 · 2019=17.4 · 2020=18.4 · 2021=57.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Robinwood Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 87 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Robinwood Assisted Living (33 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Robinwood Assisted Living
Robinwood Assisted Living (33 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Robinwood Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 57.4 40.2 9 1 0
2020 18.4 18.4 3 2 0
2019 17.4 17.4 5 0 0
2018 14.2 10.6 4 0 0
2017 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Hagerstown

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 205 employers in Hagerstown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Run Ferry Road 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at Sea Bluffs 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Vista Village 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC MD Hatchery 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE 201-NiSource-Cumberland MD-Indus Blvd 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Construction, Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2016106 - NIST Building 245 Modernization T.O. #1 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Health 2,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Medical Center 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 1,592 FTE
NAT-TCR James Fitzpatrick Residence 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Edna Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HomeServe Woburn 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Herzog-Meier Volkswagen Volvo 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4622 SPB Florida 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Liberty Nursing and Rehab 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Henry Mayo Newhall - Pom 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Oakwood Community Center - F/N 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.