Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs

Dana Point, CA · ~128 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs: 11.3 TCR = 297% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs safety composite

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2022

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs injury rate improved

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs's TCR fell 4.4 from 9.4 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=15.4 · 2018=10.0 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Dana Point, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 297% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #131/216
  • PHOTO Pine Run Ferry Road
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Run Ferry Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Fountains at Sea Bluffs averages 11.3 TCR (297% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=15.4 · 2018=10 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Fountains at Sea Bluffs falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs (128 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Fountains at Sea Bluffs
The Fountains at Sea Bluffs (128 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Fountains at Sea Bluffs has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.0 1.3 4 0 0
2021 13.9 10.5 12 0 0
2020 13.4 2.2 10 2 0
2019 11.9 10.9 8 3 0
2018 10.0 5.6 6 3 0
2017 15.4 14.3 9 5 0
2016 9.4 7.3 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Dana Point

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Dana Point, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Run Ferry Road 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Vista Village 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Pointe Assisted Living & Memory Care 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinwood Assisted Living 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dick Peixoto Company 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE BATTH FARMS 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main operations location 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Services, LLC. 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSL MBR Management II LLC 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR 45248 WALDORF ASTORIA MONARCH BEACH RESORT C 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-45248 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ritz Carlton Laguna Niguel 486 FTE
NAT-TCR Construction 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-AA-HNL-HONOLULU-HNL-TRML 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02439 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie Vista Village 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at National Zoological Park 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mg Moh 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Jupiter Medical Center-Food 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pass Christian PCM 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.