Hotels (except casino hotels) · Minnesota

Rochester Aspen Suites

Rochester, MN · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rochester Aspen Suites runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade C.

Rochester Aspen Suites: 3.1 TCR = 102% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rochester Aspen Suites safety composite

Rochester Aspen Suites scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rochester Aspen Suites held a steady TCR band

Rochester Aspen Suites's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/155
  • PHOTO Holiday Inn Express …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holiday Inn Express New Martinsville WV (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rochester Aspen Suites in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rochester Aspen Suites averages 3.1 TCR (102% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rochester Aspen Suites TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Rochester Aspen Suites falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 155 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Minnesota.

Rochester Aspen Suites (27 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rochester Aspen Suites
Rochester Aspen Suites (27 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Rochester Aspen Suites has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2017 19.4 4.8 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MN · Rochester

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express New Martinsville WV 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead Towneplace Suites 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olympic Village Inn 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Hotel Emma 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Featherstone Fruits and Vegetables LLC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City Feedmill 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms PAP MN 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR United Mechanical Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR VT Road Crews and Installation 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CWST-WILMINGTON,MA 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PHB Machining & Molding 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bluewater Thermal Solutions - Chicago Plant 1 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE SRPM Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE M3 Distribution, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (Dietary) 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.