Modular housing, residential, assembled on site by for-sale builders · Indiana

Rochester Homes Inc.

Rochester, IN · ~116 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rochester Homes Inc. runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Modular housing, residential, assembled on site by for-sale builders workplace, earning a grade F.

Rochester Homes Inc.: 11.8 TCR = 310% of Modular housing, residential, assembled on site by for-sale builders BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rochester Homes Inc. safety composite

Rochester Homes Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2024

Rochester Homes Inc. injury rate improved

Rochester Homes Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 11.6 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.6 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=17.3 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=12.0 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Rochester, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 310% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK P2
  • PHOTO JA Myers Bldg & Dev.…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JA Myers Bldg & Dev., Inc. (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Rochester Homes Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rochester Homes Inc. averages 11.8 TCR (310% of the Modular housing, residential, assembled on site by for-sale builders BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rochester Homes Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.6 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=17.3 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=12 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Rochester Homes Inc. falls in its industry

341 Modular housing, residential, establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Rochester Homes Inc. (116 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rochester Homes Inc.
Rochester Homes Inc. (116 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Rochester Homes Inc. has more employees than the Modular housing, residential, assembled median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 2.6 4 0 0
2023 7.9 2.3 7 0 0
2022 12.0 5.5 13 0 0
2021 16.6 5.2 19 0 0
2020 17.3 4.5 19 0 0
2019 13.6 4.2 16 0 0
2018 9.8 4.9 10 0 0
2017 12.2 7.0 14 0 0
2016 11.6 1.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · IN · Rochester

341 Modular housing, residential, assembled on site by for-sale builders employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 34 employers in Rochester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JA Myers Bldg & Dev., Inc. 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Mountain Enterprise 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Habitat for Humanity Tucson 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GarCon, LLC 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Egglife 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE OL Frontal Solutions 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arrow Container Manufacturing Location 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Comms Jefferson - 0220-INJE1 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodlawn Hospital 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Metal Products 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Community School Corp 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lau- Rochester 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Corbin Electrical Services, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Augustine Health and Rehabilitation Center 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Olmar Supply INC 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Denver 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Ravenna 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Country Ford 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCuSOFT 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bristal at Lake Grove 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.