Single-family housing built on own land for sale (i.e., for-sale builders) · Arizona

Habitat for Humanity Tucson

Tucson, AZ · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Habitat for Humanity Tucson runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Single-family housing built on own land for sale (i.e., for-sale builders) workplace, earning a grade F.

Habitat for Humanity Tucson: 11.0 TCR = 289% of Single-family housing built on own land for sale (i.e., for-sale builders) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Habitat for Humanity Tucson safety composite

Habitat for Humanity Tucson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2018

Habitat for Humanity Tucson injury rate improved

Habitat for Humanity Tucson's TCR fell 9.0 from 15.5 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.5 · 2018=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 289% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Blue Mountain Enterp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Mountain Enterprise (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Habitat for Humanity Tucson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Habitat for Humanity Tucson averages 11.0 TCR (289% of the Single-family housing built on own land for sale (i.e., for-sale builders) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Habitat for Humanity Tucson TCR series: 2016=15.5 · 2018=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Habitat for Humanity Tucson falls in its industry

341 Single-family housing built on establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Single-family housing built on employers in Arizona.

Habitat for Humanity Tucson (44 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Habitat for Humanity Tucson
Habitat for Humanity Tucson (44 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Habitat for Humanity Tucson has fewer employees than the Single-family housing built on own land median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.5 2.2 3 0 0
2016 15.5 2.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · AZ · Tucson

341 Single-family housing built on own land for sale (i.e., for-sale builders) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Mountain Enterprise 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beechwood Plainview 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1730_3399 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH PORT FL 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZ Alamo Ag Solutions, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Vista Construction Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willcox Main Office 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Luxe City Center 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Grass Valley (Cagva) 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 0514 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 529 Sherman, Tx 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Executive Office 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerrville Bus Company Inc. Grand Prairie Depot 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMI Manufacturing 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians Gaming Agency 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.