Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) · Minnesota

Rochester Sand & Gravel

Rochester, MN · ~109 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rochester Sand & Gravel runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) workplace, earning a grade B.

Rochester Sand & Gravel: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rochester Sand & Gravel safety composite

Rochester Sand & Gravel scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2024

Rochester Sand & Gravel injury rate improved

Rochester Sand & Gravel's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.2 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/107
  • PHOTO Buchanan and Sons Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buchanan and Sons Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rochester Sand & Gravel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rochester Sand & Gravel averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rochester Sand & Gravel TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Rochester Sand & Gravel falls in its industry

4,078 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 107 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, employers in Minnesota.

Rochester Sand & Gravel (109 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Rochester Sand & Gravel
Rochester Sand & Gravel (109 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Rochester Sand & Gravel has more employees than the Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, str median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.8 1.8 3 0 0
2020 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2019 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.2 2.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MN · Rochester

4,078 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buchanan and Sons Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindy Paving 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kokosing Construction Company, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foundation Steel, LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mathiowetz Construction Company 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE BendTec,LLC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dick Family, Inc. dba C & L Distributing Sauk Rapids 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE RL Brookdale Motors, Inc dba Luther Brookdale Honda 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Farbest Farms 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FPD Company 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4029 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USA LA Baton Rouge 707165 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bristol Mountain 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Railroad Contracting, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elvira Sandoval 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Composidie, Inc. 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.