Plumbing and heating contractors · Utah

Rocky Mountain Mechanical

Salt Lake City, UT · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rocky Mountain Mechanical runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plumbing and heating contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Rocky Mountain Mechanical: 3.4 TCR = 121% of Plumbing and heating contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rocky Mountain Mechanical safety composite

Rocky Mountain Mechanical scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

Rocky Mountain Mechanical injury rate improved

Rocky Mountain Mechanical's TCR fell 4.0 from 5.0 in 2018 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/58
  • PHOTO Bruce Heating & Air …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bruce Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Rocky Mountain Mechanical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rocky Mountain Mechanical averages 3.4 TCR (121% of the Plumbing and heating contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rocky Mountain Mechanical TCR series: 2018=5 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Rocky Mountain Mechanical falls in its industry

5,793 Plumbing and heating contracto establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 58 Plumbing and heating contracto employers in Utah.

Rocky Mountain Mechanical (82 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rocky Mountain Mechanical
Rocky Mountain Mechanical (82 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Rocky Mountain Mechanical has more employees than the Plumbing and heating contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.6 1.2 2 1 0
2022 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 3 0 0
2019 4.9 1.2 4 0 0
2018 5.0 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · UT · Salt Lake City

5,793 Plumbing and heating contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bruce Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFT Inc 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR D. Burke Mechanical Corporation 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air-Ref Co. Inc 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Core Industrial Group 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rimrock Construction 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE 353 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4794 - Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of UT, LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Contours Corbin RTF 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McNeely Plastics Products 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ARC Automotive Hartsville 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Coburn Ranch 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-845 PARAGON WAY 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-1000 W. 190TH 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 11318 - Wallkill 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bsl Framingham Development LLC 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.