Nursing homes · Pennsylvania

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC

Millmont, PA · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC: 2.6 TCR = 40% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC safety composite

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC: 0.0 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC's TCR rose 7.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 7.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Millmont, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.6 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/754
  • PHOTO Ashland Health & Reh…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ashland Health & Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC averages 2.6 TCR (40% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 754 Nursing homes employers in Pennsylvania.

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC (78 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC
Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC (78 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Rolling Hills Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 0.0 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Millmont

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ashland Health & Rehabilitation 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solon Pointe Healthcare LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Home at Kane 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Anderson Healthcare LTD dba The Anderson 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manheim Egg 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Archbald 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Homes Building Company, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bath Saver, Inc. 5 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rolling Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Springer Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Point 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocala Heating And Air Conditioning 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR M3, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catholic Charities New Hampshire DBA St. Francis Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highline Construction, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Video Industrial Services, Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Middle School 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.