Electrical contractors · North Carolina

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh

Raleigh, NC · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh: 8.3 TCR = 297% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh safety composite

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh: 11.2 → 21.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.12× in 2024

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh's TCR rose 9.9 from 11.2 in 2019 to 21.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 297% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #103/108
  • PHOTO CCI:CC016 - CC016-Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCI:CC016 - CC016-Colorado (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh averages 8.3 TCR (297% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh TCR series: 2019=11.2 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=4 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=21.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 108 Electrical contractors employers in North Carolina.

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh (67 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh
Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh (67 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Romanoff Electric Residential - Raleigh has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.1 17.6 6 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2022 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2021 5.6 2.8 4 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 1 0
2019 11.2 7.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Raleigh

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCI:CC016 - CC016-Colorado 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alternative Energy Systems 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR STRIANO ELECTRIC CO INC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lantek Communications Inc. 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherryville Location 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31827 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE David E. Looper & Company, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6775_15699 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Boise Horizon 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR New Boston Division 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Redfield 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Matson Navigation Company of Alaska LLC Anchorage 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Pet - Tampa 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Road Department 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE StoneBridge Hermann 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms McComb Hatchery 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.