Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, cookies, crackers), manufacturing · Georgia

Rome Manufacturing Facility

Rome, GA · ~581 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rome Manufacturing Facility runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, cookies, crackers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Rome Manufacturing Facility: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, cookies, crackers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rome Manufacturing Facility safety composite

Rome Manufacturing Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rome Manufacturing Facility held a steady TCR band

Rome Manufacturing Facility's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.9 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311821 · Rome, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO ABIMAR FOODS North
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~581 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABIMAR FOODS North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Rome Manufacturing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rome Manufacturing Facility averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, cookies, crackers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rome Manufacturing Facility TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Rome Manufacturing Facility falls in its industry

166 Bakery products, dry (e.g., bi establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Bakery products, dry (e.g., bi employers in Georgia.

Rome Manufacturing Facility (581 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rome Manufacturing Facility
Rome Manufacturing Facility (581 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Rome Manufacturing Facility has more employees than the Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 0.3 2 13 0
2021 1.5 0.6 5 5 0
2020 1.1 0.7 5 2 0
2019 1.5 0.3 3 6 0
2018 1.1 0.6 7 0 0
2017 0.6 0.2 4 0 0
2016 1.9 1.4 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311821 · GA · Rome

166 Bakery products, dry (e.g., biscuits, cookies, crackers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 147 employers in Rome, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABIMAR FOODS North 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snyder's Lance 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interbake foods NSC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Coast Baking 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lithia Springs Campus - Bldg 3 G062600 581 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sugar Foods Corporation- Villa Rica 582 FTE
STATE-SIZE Briggs & Stratton - Statesboro Plant 580 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC06 thredUP 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROME 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center 3,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Medical Center 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Healthcare Management Inc 2,741 FTE
NAT-TCR Eli Lilly Lilly Technology Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliance Intermodal Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan City Rentals - Morgan City 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Perrigo : Ranir 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE BP Toledo Refinery 581 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical Group Queens 581 FTE
NAT-SIZE NP Lake Mead LLC, dba Fiesta Henderson Casino Hotel 581 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAS - Flight Ops 581 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.