Roofing contractors · Maine

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC

Bangor, ME · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC: 9.7 TCR = 346% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC safety composite

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC: 5.0 → 20.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC's TCR rose 15.8 from 5.0 in 2020 to 20.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Bangor, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 346% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO AVI, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AVI, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC averages 9.7 TCR (346% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC TCR series: 2020=5 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=20.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Roofing contractors employers in Maine.

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC (42 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC
Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC (42 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Roof Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company, LLC has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.8 7.8 8 0 0
2023 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2022 9.3 4.7 4 0 0
2021 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · ME · Bangor

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 167 employers in Bangor, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AVI, Inc. 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Roofing Company 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort-Cica Roofing & general Contractors 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mahaney Group 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Saco Public Works Department 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tambrands 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cianbro Equipment LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAPPI Fine Paper/Hinckley 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Maine Medical Center 3,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acadia Hospital Corporation 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Light Acadia Hospital 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1856 499 FTE
NAT-TCR 2147 - West Covina South 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bvr, LLC 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Brunswick NJ FXFE-SBR 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Stockton CA 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Altamonte Springs 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBS-Wallingford 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE ODW Logistics - Romeoville, IL 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hero Logistics - SCD 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.