Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maine

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston

Lewiston, ME · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston runs at 569% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston: 21.6 TCR = 569% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston safety composite

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2020

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston injury rate improved

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston's TCR fell 8.6 from 15.2 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 43.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=27.8 · 2018=43.2 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lewiston, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.6 · 569% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #46/47
  • PHOTO The Bungalows at Bra…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Bungalows at Branson Meadows (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston averages 21.6 TCR (569% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=27.8 · 2018=43.2 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 47 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maine.

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston (42 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston
Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston (42 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2019 15.6 15.6 5 1 0
2018 43.2 13.5 5 11 0
2017 27.8 16.6 9 1 0
2016 15.2 12.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ME · Lewiston

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 99 employers in Lewiston, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Branson Meadows 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cimarron Labor, LLC 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dickinson Countryhouse LLC 21.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Saco Public Works Department 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tambrands 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cianbro Equipment LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAPPI Fine Paper/Hinckley 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Regional Medical Center 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Maine Medical Center 1,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7014 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7014 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Pioneer Memorial Rest Home 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thunder Ridge Beef Company, LLC 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Homestead 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Armstrong Garden Centers 716 21.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE vTv Therapeutics LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coleman Jefferson BH 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koppers Follansbee 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atascadero Christian Home 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.