Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park

Bloomfield Hills, MI · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park: 6.0 TCR = 158% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park safety composite

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park: 3.6 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2019

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park's TCR rose 4.7 from 3.6 in 2018 to 8.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bloomfield Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 158% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #97/201
  • PHOTO Quincy Place
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quincy Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rose Senior Living - Providence Park averages 6.0 TCR (158% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=8.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Rose Senior Living - Providence Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park (55 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rose Senior Living - Providence Park
Rose Senior Living - Providence Park (55 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rose Senior Living - Providence Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.4 4.2 4 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Bloomfield Hills

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 59 employers in Bloomfield Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quincy Place 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niles, Embark at 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Pointe Senior Living Community 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kittery Estates 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main - ST4 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anchor Bay Packaging Corporation - Plant 5 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE MediLodge of Greenview 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE 255280-LAPEER PO 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Super C Group LLC dba Alline Salon Group 1,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Progressive Residential Services of New Mexico 533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Progressive Residential Services of Michigan 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality South Inc 236 FTE
NAT-TCR Commercial Fixtures, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Statewide Towing & Recovery, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arctic Insulation & Manufacturing, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Martinsville Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Suddath Global Logistics 806 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilshire 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Compounds Plant 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simplex Manufacturing 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.