Specialized Freight except Used Goods Trucking Local · Minnesota

Rosemount Transportation

Rosemount, MN · ~89 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosemount Transportation runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Specialized Freight except Used Goods Trucking Local workplace, earning a grade C.

Rosemount Transportation: 3.9 TCR = 87% of Specialized Freight except Used Goods Trucking Local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosemount Transportation safety composite

Rosemount Transportation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rosemount Transportation: 1.9 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.06× in 2024

Rosemount Transportation's TCR rose 6.1 from 1.9 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Rosemount, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Button Transportatio…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Button Transportation, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rosemount Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosemount Transportation averages 3.9 TCR (87% of the Specialized Freight except Used Goods Trucking Local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosemount Transportation TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Rosemount Transportation falls in its industry

1,130 Specialized Freight except Use establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Specialized Freight except Use employers in Minnesota.

Rosemount Transportation (89 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosemount Transportation
Rosemount Transportation (89 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Rosemount Transportation has more employees than the Specialized Freight except Used Goods Tr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 8.1 5 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2022 5.9 4.4 4 0 0
2021 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 4.5 3.8 6 0 0
2017 5.3 4.5 7 0 0
2016 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · MN · Rosemount

1,130 Specialized Freight except Used Goods Trucking Local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Button Transportation, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walsh Trucking Company - Central 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klemm Tank Lines 53030 Decatur (Central IL) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doraville 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ti-Zack Concrete, LLC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Glass Company - HQ 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allweather Roof 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Saehaesung Al Inc. Andalusia Plant 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Midstate Spring 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabeth Scott Community 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Orlando 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rochester Hills 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Factory 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desertview 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Indiana Laborers 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.