Automobile suspension springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · New York

Midstate Spring

Syracuse, NY · ~76 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midstate Spring runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile suspension springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Midstate Spring: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Automobile suspension springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midstate Spring safety composite

Midstate Spring scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.4

2016→2024

Midstate Spring injury rate improved

Midstate Spring's TCR fell 13.4 from 14.5 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.5 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Automatic Spring Pro…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automatic Spring Products Corp. - Hayes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Midstate Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midstate Spring averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Automobile suspension springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midstate Spring TCR series: 2016=14.5 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Midstate Spring falls in its industry

189 Automobile suspension springs, establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Automobile suspension springs, employers in New York.

Midstate Spring (76 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Midstate Spring
Midstate Spring (76 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Midstate Spring has more employees than the Automobile suspension springs, heavy gau median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2021 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2020 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2018 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 14.5 7.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · NY · Syracuse

189 Automobile suspension springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automatic Spring Products Corp. - Hayes 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Economy Spring 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baumann Springs GP 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercer Spring & Wire LLC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brightfarms Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE POTSDAM SERVICE CENTER-NY99 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bennett Contracting Inc 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3841_7298 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosemount Transportation 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabeth Scott Community 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Saehaesung Al Inc. Andalusia Plant 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McCROSSIN FOUNDATIONS, LLC. 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Mechanical 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE The STI Group Fab. Orange 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danella Construction Corporation of Florida - FL 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fuserashi International Technology 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.